http://bayimages.net/blog/reviews/canon-5d-and-nikon-d700-resolution-comparison/ Photo gear reviews and technical information Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:06:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://bayimages.net/blog/reviews/canon-5d-and-nikon-d700-resolution-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-8 Stephen Sat, 19 Sep 2009 06:38:19 +0000 http://bayimages.net/blog/?p=481#comment-8 I used the same lens and same aperture (f/8). I do agree and think that the D700 pictures are ever so slightly sharper than the Canon ones. However, I think this might be explainable by differences in the RAW converter or the default level of sharpening. I also had to manually focus the lens when it was mounted on the canon and I may not have nailed it exactly right. I used the same lens and same aperture (f/8). I do agree and think that the D700 pictures are ever so slightly sharper than the Canon ones. However, I think this might be explainable by differences in the RAW converter or the default level of sharpening. I also had to manually focus the lens when it was mounted on the canon and I may not have nailed it exactly right.

]]> http://bayimages.net/blog/reviews/canon-5d-and-nikon-d700-resolution-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-7 jaeger Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:08:26 +0000 http://bayimages.net/blog/?p=481#comment-7 thanks for the comp. the images by the d700 look sharper and more detailed to me. you say you used the same lens? it's more obvious in the palms in fig.1 and the adobe in fig.4. i'm assuming you also used the same apertures? i'm only asking because there might be sensor dust in fig.4-indicative of a smaller aperture. thanks for the comp. the images by the d700 look sharper and more detailed to me. you say you used the same lens? it’s more obvious in the palms in fig.1 and the adobe in fig.4. i’m assuming you also used the same apertures? i’m only asking because there might be sensor dust in fig.4-indicative of a smaller aperture.

]]>